Frontiers is partnering Clarivate on a new Reviewer Recognition Service, in an effort to to give peer reviewers greater recognition for their work
Kim Eggleton
Kim Eggleton wonders: how do we solve the problem of diversity in peer review?
ELife is making changes to its policies on peer review in response to the impact of COVID-19 on the scientific community
Andrew Preston
Andrew Preston describes how to make transparent peer review work at scale
Cambridge University Press Pitt Building
A journal from Cambridge University Press (CUP) is aiming for a 'radical new approach' to both publishing and peer reviewing research
Springer Publishing Company is moving its manuscript submission and peer review system to ScholarOne. The agreement covers all of Springer Publishing Company’s journals
The Web of Science Group has entered a partnership with Emerald Publishing to pilot the industry’s first cross-publisher, scalable and transparent peer review workflow
Publons and ScholarOne have entered a partnership with IOP Publishing to introduce the industry’s first cross-publisher, scalable transparent peer review workflows
Lou Peck discovers that a challenging issue is also increasingly complex – but there is also plenty to be celebrated
Chris Graf asks: what happens to research quality when we change the peer review and the research publishing model?
Interviews for this article have been adapted from recent PhaidraCon roundtable events and from upcoming 2023 editions of EpistemiCast
Patrick Hargitt explains why 2022 became the year that accessibility got serious
Joseph Koivisto and Jordan Sly from the University of Maryland discuss the implications of the publications-as-data model
Despite the collective and decisive step changes in enabling the transition to open access this year, we should not be complacent, writes Susie Winter
Thomas Shaw and Andrew Barker from Lancaster University Library discuss the realities, challenges and future impact of open access in the research community
It’s not a question of if, but how. The future of scholarly publishing is open, yet the debate on how to accelerate the growth of open access continues
