European Journal of Higher Education will publish reviewer reports
Outstanding reviewers selected from more than 27,000 reviewers who submitted reports to IOPP journals in 2022
Miriam Maus
If scientists are successful, we are successful, writes Miriam Maus, publishing director at IOP Publishing
Image: Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock.com
Training will be delivered as four tutored online sessions carried out virtually and in real time
Scott Edmunds
Scott Edmunds highlights opportunities to improve the publishing process by improving transparency, accountability and speed
Image: s-ts/shutterstock.com
Move aimed at increasing the quality of peer review process while aiding the teaching of best practice
Image: Andrii Vodolazhskyi/Shutterstock.com
'More effort required' if society is to truly benefit from open science
Image: imtmphoto/shutterstock.com
Kim Eggleton on how using anonymity can create more diverse, equitable, and inclusive peer review
Rebecca Pool asks: will coronavirus leave preprints and peer review inextricably entwined?
Interviews for this article have been adapted from recent PhaidraCon roundtable events and from upcoming 2023 editions of EpistemiCast
Patrick Hargitt explains why 2022 became the year that accessibility got serious
Joseph Koivisto and Jordan Sly from the University of Maryland discuss the implications of the publications-as-data model
Despite the collective and decisive step changes in enabling the transition to open access this year, we should not be complacent, writes Susie Winter
Thomas Shaw and Andrew Barker from Lancaster University Library discuss the realities, challenges and future impact of open access in the research community
It’s not a question of if, but how. The future of scholarly publishing is open, yet the debate on how to accelerate the growth of open access continues
