Peer review, preprints and a pandemic
Rebecca Pool asks: will coronavirus leave preprints and peer review inextricably entwined?
Challenges in the Scholarly Publishing Cycle 2020/2021
Rebecca Pool asks: will coronavirus leave preprints and peer review inextricably entwined?
There was high praise for the fourth iteration of CISPC – this year held in an entirely digital format
Rebecca Pool asks: has Covid-19 pushed the move towards open data to the point of no return?
Alenka Prinčič and Frédérique Belliard describe how they influenced the change from traditional academic publisher to innovative and community-driven university press at TU Delft
Data is everywhere – but where does it come from, where is it being stored, and is it worth keeping? It is crucial to take stock, says Paul Stokes
Oluchi Ojinamma Okere considers Nigerian academic libraries and their struggle for relevance
Daniel Keirs considers open science from the perspective of a physics publisher, including some of the steps needed to accelerate progress
Documentary-maker Alex Freeman never imagined she would create a tool that could overhaul the structure of academic publishing, writes Faye Holst
The pandemic has demonstrated the importance of open access and open science, writes Rossana Morriello
The open research agenda – for publications, data, and code – is driving companies to explore new business models, writes Lisa Hinchliffe
Interviews for this article have been adapted from recent PhaidraCon roundtable events and from upcoming 2023 editions of EpistemiCast
Patrick Hargitt explains why 2022 became the year that accessibility got serious
Joseph Koivisto and Jordan Sly from the University of Maryland discuss the implications of the publications-as-data model
Despite the collective and decisive step changes in enabling the transition to open access this year, we should not be complacent, writes Susie Winter
Thomas Shaw and Andrew Barker from Lancaster University Library discuss the realities, challenges and future impact of open access in the research community
It’s not a question of if, but how. The future of scholarly publishing is open, yet the debate on how to accelerate the growth of open access continues