NBK has made a great start providing one place for UK academic library data, writes Sarah Bartlett
Analysis & opinion
21 March 2019
Donald Samulack presents some highlights from a report on the different approaches to the biggest change in research availability in decades
18 March 2019
Looking out into the vast Pacific Ocean from the SSP venue in San Diego will be an ideal opportunity to reflect on the (literal) wide world of publishing
25 February 2019
David Prosser was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle
21 February 2019
Lou Peck discovers that a challenging issue is also increasingly complex – but there is also plenty to be celebrated
18 February 2019
Jane Winters was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018
14 February 2019
Robert-Jan Smits gave an impassioned update – and defence – of Plan S at APE 2019 in Berlin
14 February 2019
Sabine Hossenfelder was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018
13 February 2019
Brett Rubinstein was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018
29 January 2019
Chris Graf asks: what happens to research quality when we change the peer review and the research publishing model?
24 January 2019
Roger Valade traces developments in scholarly communications over the last couple of decades, from CD-ROM to artificial intelligence
24 January 2019
Vitek Tracz describes his perspective on the changes in the way researchers have communicated their findings over the last 100 issues of Research Information
Pages
Latest issue
Authors need to be reconnected to the library to make it the starting point for research, argues Robert Lisiecki
Earlier this year, the UK-based Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate Analytics, published a report called Profiles, not Metrics
Joe Tragert explains how to leverage discovery platforms as information literacy training tools
The mechanisms of scholarly communication are showing their age, writes Daniel Hook