COUNTER project director Tasha Mellins-Cohen
First released in 2017, Release 5 of the COUNTER Code of Practice (CoP) incorporates the concept of continuous maintenance
David Stuart writes: are new ways of measuring research are providing a more realistic picture of scholarly communication?
Gali Halevi
Gali Halevi discusses the impact of new publishing outlets and formats
Josh Nicholson
Citations are much more than just a number or a metric used to price journal subscriptions or APCs, writes Josh Nicholson
Report covers 20,000 journals from 113 countries across five continents and 254 research categories
Faculty Opinions Score designed to be an early indicator of an article’s future impact
Tim Lloyd
Measuring the impact of open access agreements is critical for developing sustainable business models, writes Tim Lloyd
Covid-19 research papers account for around 30 per cent of the Altmetric Top 100 list, released today (20 January)
Nandita Quaderi
Nandita Quaderi, editor-in-chief of the Web of Science at Clarivate, explains what editorial integrity means for citation data and journal evaluation
Interviews for this article have been adapted from recent PhaidraCon roundtable events and from upcoming 2023 editions of EpistemiCast
Patrick Hargitt explains why 2022 became the year that accessibility got serious
Joseph Koivisto and Jordan Sly from the University of Maryland discuss the implications of the publications-as-data model
Despite the collective and decisive step changes in enabling the transition to open access this year, we should not be complacent, writes Susie Winter
Thomas Shaw and Andrew Barker from Lancaster University Library discuss the realities, challenges and future impact of open access in the research community
It’s not a question of if, but how. The future of scholarly publishing is open, yet the debate on how to accelerate the growth of open access continues
