Interviews for this article have been adapted from recent PhaidraCon roundtable events and from upcoming 2023 editions of EpistemiCast
Features
26 July 2018
Four industry figures discuss the latest developments around semantic enrichment with Tim Gillett
26 July 2018
As the open access landscape grows in volume and complexity, Rebecca Pool asks whether calls for caution should be heard
24 May 2018
Nine industry figures give Tim Gillett the low-down on recent developments in discovery as part of the research process
24 May 2018
From the Journal Impact Factor to the latest altmetrics, scholarly players are crying out for metrics to be used responsibly, reports Rebecca Pool
23 March 2018
Be it slow evolution or a revolution, ebook development continues to thrill and chill scholarly players, reports Rebecca Pool
09 February 2018
London’s Business Design Centre was the venue for Research Information’s inaugural event, Challenges in the Scholarly Publishing Cycle
09 February 2018
Rebecca Pool asks: was 2017 the year that scholarly publishing let in open peer review?
21 November 2017
Alternative metrics have moved the measure of impact from mere citation to mentions on social media, news outlets and more, writes Rebecca Pool. So where next for metrics?
29 September 2017
Complex workflows and new services are driving developments in cloud-based library management systems, reports Rebecca Pool
21 July 2017
Open access looks set to shake up the humanities and social sciences book landscape for the better, reports Rebecca Pool
28 June 2017
Change is constant in scholarly publishing; nowhere more than in the world of metrics. Here, four industry leaders offer Tim Gillett some predictions for the future
28 June 2017
As publishers and platform hosts root out discovery issues one by one, the path to clear-cut discovery is unfolding, writes Rebecca Pool
Pages
Latest issue
Patrick Hargitt explains why 2022 became the year that accessibility got serious
Joseph Koivisto and Jordan Sly from the University of Maryland discuss the implications of the publications-as-data model
Despite the collective and decisive step changes in enabling the transition to open access this year, we should not be complacent, writes Susie Winter
Thomas Shaw and Andrew Barker from Lancaster University Library discuss the realities, challenges and future impact of open access in the research community
It’s not a question of if, but how. The future of scholarly publishing is open, yet the debate on how to accelerate the growth of open access continues
