INASP and AJOL have launched a comprehensive framework for assessing the quality of the publishing processes of journals in the global south. The announcement was made at the opening session of the COASP meeting this morning in Lisbon, Portugal.
The Journal Publishing Practices and Standards (JPPS) framework provides detailed and internationally accepted assessment criteria for the quality of publishing practices and policies of Southern journals.
JPPS will inform and reassure authors and readers about reputable journals. More uniquely, it will also provide guidance to journal editors on how they should improve their publishing processes. Editors can resubmit their journals for reassessment six months to a year after the initial assessment if they can demonstrate improvement. INASP and AJOL also offer training and support to help journals improve their publishing processes.
Journals in the developing world face many challenges in being respected in the international research and publishing landscape. These concerns can also limit the perceived credibility of the research published within those journals.
Sioux Cumming, programme manager for INASP’s Journals Online project, explained: ‘For the many problems facing countries in the developing world to be properly addressed, it is vital that Southern researchers have the opportunity to publish their research and for it to be discoverable by other local – as well as global – researchers.
‘Ensuring that high-quality Southern journals are trusted as part of local and global scholarship is essential for redressing scholarly imbalances and helping the Sustainable Development Goals to be realised.’
JPPS addresses the concerns that are often raised about the perceived quality of publication practices, policies and processes implemented by Southern journals. Journals assessed against the JPPS criteria are given one of six levels: inactive title; new title; no stars; one star; two stars; and three stars. The 108 criteria measure factors such as the amount of information included on a journals’ website; the transparency and robustness of the peer-review process; and the journal’s archiving policy.
The assigned JPPS levels serve a dual purpose. For readers and authors, they provide assurance that an assessed journal does meet an internationally recognised set of defined criteria at a particular level. For journal editors, the detailed feedback from the JPPS assessment helps them identify specifics ways to improve the quality of their journal with a view to achieving a higher level at the next assessment.
Susan Murray, executive director of AJOL, said: ‘We are very proud to be launching the JPPS framework, which builds on many years of work by AJOL and INASP in supporting the dissemination of Southern journals and understanding the various local contexts and challenges faced by these journals.
‘This robust assessment framework is designed to demonstrate internationally accepted good practices in journal publishing and showcase partner journals on our platform that are already implementing these practices. It will also support our ongoing work of helping Southern journals to improve their processes.’