Patent power
We ask Ann Chapman, co-founder of Minesoft, about patent information and 10 years of the PatBase patent database
We ask Ann Chapman, co-founder of Minesoft, about patent information and 10 years of the PatBase patent database
Automating allocation of reviewers can speed up the review process - but the information about the reviewers' interests need to be good. Sian Harris speaks to the co-founder and CEO of open-access publisher Frontiers
Janne-Tuomas Seppanen describes a new journal that he hopes will provide recognition for good peer reviews
Jackie Jones discusses why Wiley is piloting a new system to help transfer peer review between journals
Last May, ProQuest bought e-book aggregator EBL. Sian Harris finds out about the company's plans to bring this and other businesses more closely together
Childhood friends formed New Zealand-based Publons to help academics build a reputation for their reviews, writes Sian Harris
Sian Harris asks four subscription agents about how libraries purchase content and the implications of this for the agent's role
Many discussions at the Online Information 2013 conference focused on the changes and opportunities for information professionals, writes Sian Harris
As preservation professionals meet the rising demands of traditional publishers, can they also attend to the needs of riskier ventures, asks Rebecca Pool
Interviews for this article have been adapted from recent PhaidraCon roundtable events and from upcoming 2023 editions of EpistemiCast
Patrick Hargitt explains why 2022 became the year that accessibility got serious
Joseph Koivisto and Jordan Sly from the University of Maryland discuss the implications of the publications-as-data model
Despite the collective and decisive step changes in enabling the transition to open access this year, we should not be complacent, writes Susie Winter
Thomas Shaw and Andrew Barker from Lancaster University Library discuss the realities, challenges and future impact of open access in the research community
It’s not a question of if, but how. The future of scholarly publishing is open, yet the debate on how to accelerate the growth of open access continues