Springer Nature pledges support for Plan S
Publisher Springer Nature has stated its 'strong support' to accelerate the adoption of open access under Plan S
Publisher Springer Nature has stated its 'strong support' to accelerate the adoption of open access under Plan S
Springer Nature and Publons are partnering to improve the peer review process and to enable peer reviewers to receive recognition for their contribution
While researchers, publishers and funders warm to data sharing, issues over misuse, citation and credit remain, reports Rebecca Pool
SpringerNature’s new CEO Daniel Ropers was keynote speaker at the STM Frankfurt event this month. Here, he outlines his early thoughts as a ‘newbie’ to scholarly communications
From the Journal Impact Factor to the latest altmetrics, scholarly players are crying out for metrics to be used responsibly, reports Rebecca Pool
Taylor & Francis Group and Cambridge University Press have joined a pilot project to test blockchain technologies applications to peer review
Three publishers and ResearchGate have agreed to work together on the sharing of articles on the scholarly collaboration platform
The overwhelming majority of professional staff in research institutions and libraries across the globe view open access as the future of academic and scientific publishing
Until recently, the evaluation of research output and impact has focused largely on journal articles
SciGraph, the linked open data (LOD) platform launched by Springer Nature in March, now holds more one billion metadata statements about content published by the company and links to established external datasets.
Interviews for this article have been adapted from recent PhaidraCon roundtable events and from upcoming 2023 editions of EpistemiCast
Patrick Hargitt explains why 2022 became the year that accessibility got serious
Joseph Koivisto and Jordan Sly from the University of Maryland discuss the implications of the publications-as-data model
Despite the collective and decisive step changes in enabling the transition to open access this year, we should not be complacent, writes Susie Winter
Thomas Shaw and Andrew Barker from Lancaster University Library discuss the realities, challenges and future impact of open access in the research community
It’s not a question of if, but how. The future of scholarly publishing is open, yet the debate on how to accelerate the growth of open access continues