In Review
22 October 2018
BioMed Central has created a new service, In Review.
Authors need to be reconnected to the library to make it the starting point for research, argues Robert Lisiecki
BioMed Central
Peer Review 2030: report looks to the future
2 May 2017
In order to effect real, industry-wide improvements to the peer review process, publishers, researchers, funders and institutions need to be willing to experiment with different models, encourage more diversity in the reviewer pool, utilise artificial intelligence and support training and mentoring for peer reviewers
Latest issue
Earlier this year, the UK-based Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate Analytics, published a report called Profiles, not Metrics
Joe Tragert explains how to leverage discovery platforms as information literacy training tools
The mechanisms of scholarly communication are showing their age, writes Daniel Hook