In Review
22 October 2018
BioMed Central has created a new service, In Review.
Publisher De Gruyter describes a digital transformation of its business
BioMed Central
Peer Review 2030: report looks to the future
2 May 2017
In order to effect real, industry-wide improvements to the peer review process, publishers, researchers, funders and institutions need to be willing to experiment with different models, encourage more diversity in the reviewer pool, utilise artificial intelligence and support training and mentoring for peer reviewers
Latest issue
Image: Vasin Lee/shutterstock.com
Eighteen months into the pandemic, Rebecca Pool asks: do libraries face an exclusively digital future?
Gali Halevi
Gali Halevi discusses the impact of new publishing outlets and formats
Ben Kaube (left) and Andrew Preston
Andrew Preston and Ben Kaube tell us about their new venture Cassyni
Image: imtmphoto/shutterstock.com
Kim Eggleton on how using anonymity can create more diverse, equitable, and inclusive peer review
Hannah Heckner
When it comes to platforms and the shifting OA landscape there's no one-size-fits-all solution, writes Hannah Heckner
Nick Newcomer
Diversity, equity, and inclusion are at the forefront of every conversation in higher education and academia, writes Nick Newcomer
Nicola Jones
The time for action is now, write Nicola Jones and Nick Campbell
Image: Anna Kutukova/Shutterstock.com
Hilde van Zeeland and Juan Castro describe how natural language processing is changing the game
