The hidden cost of peer review: a system under strain
As scholarly communication evolves, so must the structures that sustain it, writes Gali Halevi
As scholarly communication evolves, so must the structures that sustain it, writes Gali Halevi
Project included the migration of user data, metadata and workflow history from the previous systems
Emerging challenges are exposing limits to a system that was not designed to withstand, writes Kim Eggleton
Reviewers were paid £220 per manuscript, conditional on timely completion and editorial assessment of review quality
Duplicate Review Checker automatically flags duplicate review activity immediately and directly to editorial teams
Largest groups of recipients came from China, the USA, India, Italy and Germany, with China accounting for nearly a third
Publisher says financial compensation has been offered in connection with editorial or peer-review activities
Programme aims to introduce structured framework prioritising the quality and rigour of reviews over volume
Frontiers paper says publishing policy now needs to keep pace with a "global community eager to use AI confidently and responsibly"
Collaboration aimed at enhancing peer review transparency and recognition, and strengthening integrity
AIP Publishing has selected River Valley’s ReView 3.0 submission and peer review platform to manage the AIP Conference Proceedings program
Development will "help authors get work published faster while preserving peer review reports throughout the process"