From fatigue to fulfillment
Ashutosh Ghildiyal discusses ways to combat reviewer burnout in scholarly publishing
Peer review
Shining a light on constructive feedback in peer review
IOP Publishing is raising awareness of the importance of constructive and respectful peer review feedback
Peer review ‘must keep pace with rapidly changing landscape’
Systems must evolve and advance to adapt to interdisciplinary processes, writes Faye Holst
AI in research and publishing workflows: a new paradigm
Dave Flanagan outlines how artificial intelligence is being used to enhance productivity and innovation
Innovation, technology, and the pace of change
Peer Review Week 2024 organisers report ‘remarkable’ response to community poll, write Maria Machado and Anne T Stone
Review in the age of generative AI
Generative AI technologies can offer sustainable and impactful solutions, writes Markus Kaindl
Peer review communities “still feel overburdened”
IOP Publishing report reveals peer review capacity not used to its full potential
Springer Nature developing new peer review platform
Snapp 'a key investment in the future of publishing', which has today reached the milestone of one million submissions
IOP Publishing unveils feedback system for reviewers
Publisher has rolled out the new programme on an opt-in basis across all its proprietary journals
De-pressurising the system for researchers
Chris Graf outlines three challenges for future research publishers to ease the pressure on reviewers
Webinar: Addressing Reviewer Bugbears with Innovations in Peer Review
In advance of Peer Review Week (25-29 September), Research Information consultant editor Tim Gillett hosted a webinar on behalf of IOP Publishing and Morressier
Best Practices for Peer Review of Scholarly Books – 2nd edition
Release reflects 'increased focus on making this essential step in manuscript evaluation more equitable'