Rogue peer review – a polysemy in the making
Lou Peck discovers that a challenging issue is also increasingly complex – but there is also plenty to be celebrated
Analysis and opinion
Open access ‘seems such a seismic change’
Jane Winters was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018
‘Those who hold the purse can change the system’
Robert-Jan Smits gave an impassioned update – and defence – of Plan S at APE 2019 in Berlin
‘I can understand anger against publishers’
Sabine Hossenfelder was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018
‘An ongoing shift in the library’s role’
Brett Rubinstein was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018
Cause and effect
Chris Graf asks: what happens to research quality when we change the peer review and the research publishing model?
The evolution of an industry
Roger Valade traces developments in scholarly communications over the last couple of decades, from CD-ROM to artificial intelligence
Prisoners of a system
Vitek Tracz describes his perspective on the changes in the way researchers have communicated their findings over the last 100 issues of Research Information
‘Publishers could be doing so many different things’
Elaine L. Westbrooks was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018
What is the added value of a traditional publisher?
Lyubomir Penev was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018
‘Libraries have a critical role engaging with faculty’
Martha Sedgwick was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018
‘We have to work better together, we have to work smarter together’
Stephanie Dawson was interviewed as part of Research Information's report The Scholarly Publishing Research Cycle 2018