NEWS

US Senate approves mandate for access to NIH research

The US Senate has approved a bill that directs the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to require rather than request that the researchers it funds make their results publicly available. 

The FY2008 Labor, HHS, and Education Appropriations Bill (S.1710), which includes this provision, was approved in October. This bill will now be reconciled with the House Appropriations Bill, which contains a similar provision.

‘[The] Senate action is a milestone victory for public access to taxpayer-funded research,’ said Heather Joseph, executive director of SPARC (the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, a founding member of the Alliance for Taxpayer Access which lobbies on this issue). ‘This policy sets the stage for researchers, patients, and the general public to benefit in new and important ways from our collective investment in the critical biomedical research conducted by the NIH.’

Under a mandatory policy, NIH-funded researchers will be required to deposit copies of eligible manuscripts into the National Library of Medicine¹s online database, PubMed Central. Articles will be made publicly available no later than 12 months after publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

The current NIH Public Access Policy, first implemented in 2005, is a voluntary measure and has resulted in a deposit rate of less than 5 per cent by individual investigators. The advance to a mandatory policy is the result of more than two years of monitoring and evaluation by the NIH, Congress, and the community.

‘We welcome the NIH policy being made mandatory and thank Congress for backing this important step,’ said Gary Ward, treasurer of the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). ‘Free and timely public access to scientific literature is necessary to ensure that new discoveries are made as quickly as feasible.’

The final, consolidated bill will have to pass the US House and the Senate before being delivered to the President at the end of this year.

Twitter icon
Google icon
Del.icio.us icon
Digg icon
LinkedIn icon
Reddit icon
e-mail icon
Feature

As scholarly publishing edges closer to open access, industry players are devising radical ways to cut costs. Rebecca Pool reports

Feature

The need to organise information efficiently and reliably is more important than ever, argues Allan Gajadhar

Feature

The scholarly publishing community will descend on the ExCeL Centre for a two-day event in December, writes Clive Snell

Interview

Pinar Erzin is founder and president of Accucoms

Feature

 Suzanne Kavanagh, director of marketing and membership services at ALPSP, outlines what delegates can expect at their annual conference this September